LinkedIn’s algorithm in 2025 is engineered to surface relevant, engaging content for professionals. That has always been the goal of LinkedIn's feed. But today? They're getting better and better at it. As a business owner, founder, content creator, solopreneur, or anyone looking to grow on LinkedIn: this is for you. Understanding how this algorithm works will help you craft posts that gain more visibility, grow your network, and effectively market your product (or service, or solution). Below is a structured breakdown of key components – from how content is ranked in the feed to optimizing your profile for search – along with actionable, data-backed insights and recent changes you should know.
As someone who has been actively creating, selling, and building companies on LinkedIn for 8 years, this is going to include plenty of historical context, too. So for those of you who have been around LinkedIn for a while, we'll try to dispel some myths and misconceptions that you might have believed based on past information!
LinkedIn uses a mix of automated filtering and relevance signals to decide which posts appear in a user’s feed. (The one exception to this is when a highly viral post eventually makes its way to the LinkedIn editorial desk, and a human decision can be made to make that post "superviral" based on their judgement. However, this is unlikely to happen to you, so don't worry about it.)
Here's how the initial automated filtration and signal system works:
Initially, every post is scanned by their machine learning algorithm for spam or low-quality content. Posts that misuse tags (more than ~3 hashtags or irrelevant tagging of users or company pages) or are posted too frequently (under 12 hours apart) risk being flagged as spam. If you've been flagged as spam in the past and you only ever post spam, this is what creators sometimes refer to as being "shadowbanned".
For that matter: if your posts normally get 3,000 impressions on average, and today your post got 800 impressions, you weren't shadowbanned. Your content just wasn't very good. Sorry. Now, please read on :)
Once a post passes the spam filter, the algorithm uses three main ranking factors to determine visibility:
Kind of. But here's the main point: More followers does not necessarily mean more reach.
It's logical, if you think about it: the overall number of LinkedIn users, at least in the United States for example, is increasing relatively slowly (Statista projects a little over 1% annual user growth rate). And LinkedIn's ad revenue is increasing faster than that (10-15% per year, with a recent predicted surge in 2024 to the higher end of that range as brands flee X due to its ownership by Elon Musk) or maybe less going forward.
Do the math: with even a 5-10% increase in ad revenue, assuming some corresponding growth in ad load in the feed, plus many more creators flocking to LinkedIn to get in on the action, and you have a lot less supply of organic reach than the 1% annual growth rate in users, if we extrapolate out the US data. (And I use the US data here because the lion's share of creators want to sell to US decision makers.)
All this is a recipe for a slowly-shrinking pie: less organic reach available per creator, on average. Remember, as more followers and connections are built? The pie is not getting bigger, it's just getting more connected. So the relationship between follower count and reach is going to continue to decouple over time.
Put simply: I follow WAY more people than the number of posts I view.
Right now I'm following about 20,000 people (mostly due to connections), but I maybe only end up viewing 1000-3000 posts per month on LinkedIn in total. In other words, I follow 10x more people than the number of posts that I end up viewing. Adding to that is this: the fact that I follow someone may or may not be the best determinant of whether I want to see that person’s posts. LinkedIn is smart: following is just one factor of many as to whether a post will be shown to any given user. Their algorithm is more complex than that.
Among the top 10 creators by reach in Aware in 2024, 95% of them had over 40,000 followers. Of the rest of creators by reach (i.e. not the Top 10), fewer than 5% of them had 40,000+ followers. Obviously, this is a very strong relationship! But remember: the relationship only works one way.
Like we talked about:
Having a lot of engagement tends to create follower growth; having high follower count today, though, doesn't mean you'll keep that reach! Because the pie is shrinking.
It's true: your posts are first shown to an “inner circle” of people very likely to engage, then after that to a “medium circle”, and so forth. So your engagement rate is going to be really good at first, and then it's going to drop, as your reach goes up. But LinkedIn has clearly determined that just being a follower of someone doesn’t mean that you’ll see all their content, or that you want to see it every day. There just isn't enough dwell time to go around, as the number of creators rises. So the share of reach will become more and more unequal.
I remember that back in 2023 through early 2024, people were complaining about “only seeing the same people in their feed all the time”. This was valid! So LinkedIn has done a good job of adding feed diversity: you see more posts on certain topics, but not necessarily from the same people over and over. This complaint has largely gone away. (It's been replaced by other complaints, to be sure.)
Our proprietary data show that some creators are gaining reach - sometimes, a LOT of it! - and some are losing. Most are in about the same ballpark as before, or slightly down:
We took that data and bucketed it:
Wow: in other words, things are changing, but if you think the fact that there's less reach to go around means you're doomed? That is just not true!
While LinkedIn has said they will soon down-rank engagement bait (e.g. “Please like/share!” or "Comment X to get Y" posts), we have seen that this is only partially true so far. The algorithm now better detects and has begun to penalize clickbait pleas for engagement, instead prioritizing posts that generate genuine discussions. Another 2025 shift is the increased emphasis on the first-hour performance (the “golden hour”) – if a post gets strong engagement quickly, it’s accelerated to more people’s feeds (beyond your immediate network) faster than before. This was always true, but it's even more true today. The corollary to this? Posts will either slow down much more quickly, such as after the first two hours; or, they will last much longer, such as a week or more.
In other words:
The first hour matters quite a bit, the first 24 hours matter less than before, and the days following a post are more important than before.
We'll get into engagement bait a lot more, in the next section.
One other thing to mention:
Don't bother with them. There's some very marginal benefit to being found by creators who are searching for posts with particular hashtags, but this is going away in the AI age. For example, Aware's Influencer Discovery feature doesn't rely on hashtags at all, but rather programmatically defined Topics, Buckets, or Signals. LinkedIn's algorithm is working in much the same way.
1-2 hashtags probably won't hurt you, but why take up valuable real estate with them, when you could skip them?
Engagement is the currency of the LinkedIn feed algorithm. However, not all engagement is equal – LinkedIn values quality over quantity in interactions. Here are the engagement signals that most boost a post’s visibility:
Speaking of asking for engagement:
We tested out a lead magnet post of roughly similar quality, format, and media roughly 10 months apart: May 2024, and March 2025. Here were the posts, and the stats:
Results:
That's almost the same amount of comments, but a little over half the reach, of my similar post 10 months prior.
Results:
Curious! Now to be clear: I didn't find that this was a "worse" performance, at all. In fact, it felt about the same. The main difference is that fewer people saw the post, but the impact it had on my ecosystem and my community, was similar.
Conclusion: There was a moderate "reach penalty" around asking for engagement 2025 vs 2024. But the amount of engagement this generated was still far above average. While LinkedIn may "not want you" to post these kinds of formats, they still work.
Again: just make sure you deliver. Remember, user signals are an algorithmic proxy for people's trust in you. If you deliver, that creates trust and an algorithm boost for you.
Engaging with others’ content can indirectly boost the visibility of your own posts. It also causes your profile to be seen up to 3x, 4x, or even 5x more on LinkedIn than the reach of your posts alone. When you regularly leave thoughtful comments on industry peers’ posts, you increase your profile’s visibility in those circles. Some of those people are likely to engage back on your content, completing a virtuous cycle. This means being an active commenter and participant on LinkedIn (not just a broadcaster of your own posts) helps the algorithm recognize you as a valuable contributor, which can lead to broader reach for your posts!
YES. It does! While there are significant outliers, there is a strong correlation (0.57) between the quantity of comments you write, and the quantity of comments you receive. In fact, we’ve tabulated a number of correlations across this, and other, LinkedIn metrics and data points:
What is curious, but not surprising to us, is that Top Creators (defined as the top 5% by reach, in our 2024 study) are not adding that many new connections - they’re mostly adding followers. We also found it interesting that Reach was only somewhat correlated with the number of comments written. This aligns with our thesis that reach is volatile, changing every few months as the algorithm does, and is also not a very good predictor of actual business success. But engagement, especially high-quality engagement from the right people, IS a good predictor.
The chart below illustrates this with clarity:
I explore the data above, including what explains the extreme high and low outliers of the comments received vs written relationship (hint: the left end is “influencers who have so much reach they don’t feel they need to engage much, and the right end is “automated spam commenters who don’t add value”!), here on Youtube:
More data that has arrived from LinkedIn very recently is beginning to show the impact of commenting on Profile Appearances: in other words, how often your profile has been shown to someone on LinkedIn, anywhere. Some people are reporting that this number is 60% from comments, 10% from comments, etc.
But for my (Alex Boyd’s) profile for example, the number is 55.9% from posts, 41.5% from comments. To translate: almost half of the millions of times my profile is viewed each year, are from my comments. (And that’s not because I have low post reach: in the last 365 days, my posts have been viewed over 1.3M times.)
Clearly, you can’t sleep on engagement if you want to grow on LinkedIn. Contribute to your market! And by the same token: post the kind of content that invites others to contribute, implicitly or directly.
Getting the most out of the LinkedIn algorithm not only requires what you post but when and how often you post, as well as the format of content. Take this with a grain of salt, but here are best practices backed by LinkedIn data and social media studies:
Aim for a regular posting cadence that you can sustain with quality content. LinkedIn’s own data shows that posting at least weekly can double the engagement rate compared to posting less often. Many find success posting about 1-3 times per week – enough to stay on your network’s radar, but not so much that quality dips. Consistency trains your audience (and the algorithm) that you’re an active contributor.
Avoid excessive posting in a single day, as LinkedIn may suppress posts if you don’t allow a ~12-hour gap between them. I find that if the quality is good, it's okay to post at - say, 8am and 4pm. The later post catches the wave of the other side of the globe waking up. But: it’s better to have one strong post a day (or a few per week) that gets good engagement than several sparse posts. Track your own analytics to find a sweet spot; some personal brands post daily, but for a business page or busy professional, twice a week of high-value content might outperform daily trivial updates.
But weekly is definitely better:
Our data show that, in 2024, those who posted at least weekly gained 9% engagement; those who posted less frequently than that, lost -25% median post engagements.
If you're able to design a content system that lets you post high quality content daily? All the better. Jut don't sacrifice substance.
As a rule, weekday mornings tend to yield the best engagement on LinkedIn, aligning with professionals’ work schedules. Studies have found that Tuesday 7–10 AM and Thursday around noon or early evening (post 5-6 PM) are particularly high-engagement windows for many industries. Mid-week (Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays) is often cited as the prime time for LinkedIn activity. Mondays can be hit-or-miss (some people catch up on emails first), and Fridays might see lower engagement in the afternoon as people log off for the weekend. Weekends generally have the lowest activity on LinkedIn for most professional audiences.
That said, know your audience – if you target, say, restaurant owners or healthcare workers, their schedules might differ. Use your Aware analytics or tools like Hootsuite’s “Best Time to Publish” to see when your followers are most often online. The key is to synchronize posting with when a critical mass of your network is scrolling the feed, to harness that golden first hour of engagement.
The Pattern of Engagement: Our own data at Aware, primarily from USA and Western Europe, show that there is a measurable spike in total and median post engagement starting at around 7AM Eastern Time, peaking at 8-9AM Eastern Time, and declining thereafter. This flattens out between 8PM through Midnight ET. Then, it picks up as Europe gets online, then peaking the next day, and so forth.
No doubt this data would be very different if our customer base were primarily based in Singapore, or Australia, or Japan, or Hawai'i, or somewhere else. But if you sell to the United States, this is very reliable.
LinkedIn’s algorithm doesn’t just treat all posts equally – it has preferences based on format, largely tied to what keeps users engaged on the platform. As before, we'll share the general guidance and numbers, and then put them into context.
Here are some ideas on how to use each type of media:
But: You Must Personalize All Of This To You!
For example, in my own content, my text posts have performed extremely well. So have my image posts. And this of course in part because the average is brought up by outliers:
You might look at this and think: "But, didn't you just say that short form video was highly rewarded? Why is the video average engagement not very high?"
That's because of two things:
So is the idea that "video is better" or "carousels are better" or anything like that?
No!
Regardless of what the trends or overall numbers say: the important thing is to take into account
Maybe you're just a badass at carousels. Great. Do more of those.
Or maybe you just can't stand posting photos or screenshots or whatever, so you want to stick to text.
So be it.
Lean into your strengths.
Just to prove the point... here's Sam Browne's 2024 Wrapped Statistics:
He's getting INCREDIBLE engagement. 3X the average Aware user, almost. In total, at least.
My text posts, Sam Browne's carousels, Tiger's videos.... they're all playing to each of our strengths.
I rest my case.
If you plan to use LinkedIn Ads to promote your business, it’s important to understand how LinkedIn’s advertising algorithm targets audiences and optimizes ad delivery. LinkedIn Ads are powerful for B2B marketing due to their precise targeting, but they can be costly, so strategy is key. Here’s a breakdown of how the system works:
LinkedIn’s ad platform lets you target users by extremely granular professional criteria. You can filter by job title, industry, company size, seniority, skills, interests, geography, and more. This means you can, for example, show an ad only to “Marketing Directors in Tech companies with 200+ employees in the US” or “HR professionals in healthcare in Seattle.” The algorithm will deliver your ads only to people who fit the targeting you set.
Precise targeting often yields higher quality leads (since the audience is very relevant) but note that it can also raise your costs due to competition for that specific segment. Conversely, broader targeting can lower costs (less competition) but might include less interested users. A best practice is to start with clear buyer persona criteria, then experiment by widening or narrowing the filters to find a cost-effective balance.
Behind the scenes, LinkedIn assigns a Relevance Score to your ads based on how well your ad is performing and resonating with the target audience. It takes into account factors like your ad’s click-through rate (CTR), impressions vs. interactions, and perhaps the relevance of the ad copy/creative to the audience. A higher relevance score means LinkedIn’s algorithm thinks users find your ad valuable. This score directly impacts the ad auction: ads with higher relevance are more likely to win placement and often cost less per click/impression because the platform rewards engaging ads. In practical terms, if two advertisers are bidding to show ads to the same audience, and you have a more relevant ad (higher engagement, better alignment to audience interests) than the other, you can win even if your bid is slightly lower.
This encourages advertisers to make quality ads, not just throw money at the problem. To improve relevance: make sure your ad messaging aligns closely with your target’s needs, use clear and professional visuals, and keep the content tightly focused on one offer or call-to-action. Also ensure the landing page your ad leads to is consistent with the ad (so users don’t bounce – LinkedIn tracks if people actually engage after clicking).
LinkedIn Ads run on an auction model similar to Google or Facebook. When there’s an opportunity to show an ad to a user, LinkedIn evaluates all advertisers targeting that user and decides whose ad gets shown. It considers your bid, your ad’s relevance score/quality, and your chosen bidding strategy.
LinkedIn uses a second-price auction, meaning if you win, you typically pay just a bit more than the next highest bidder’s bid, not necessarily your max bid. There are multiple bidding strategies:When you create a campaign, you’ll also choose an objective (like Brand Awareness, Website Visits, Lead Generation, etc.), and that can dictate which bidding options are available (for example, Lead Gen campaigns might allow cost-per-lead bidding). The algorithm will optimize delivery towards that objective – e.g., if you choose Lead Generation, it shows ads to people in your target likely to fill forms, whereas if you choose Website Visits, it optimizes for click likelihood.
LinkedIn recommends a sufficiently large daily budget (often around $50–100/day minimum) to gather data and let the algorithm work effectively. Costs on LinkedIn are typically higher than Facebook; average cost-per-click (CPC) might range $2–$7, and cost per 1000 impressions (CPM) around $5–$8, depending on audience competition. If you’re on a small budget, consider using manual bidding to cap bids, or focus on a very specific audience to avoid wasting spend.
Monitor your Campaign Performance metrics (like CTR, conversion rate if using Lead Gen Forms, etc.). A low CTR could hurt your relevance score, so tweak your ad copy or targeting if you see that. Aim for a CTR above 0.5% at least; on LinkedIn, 1%+ is quite good. By understanding these mechanics, you can let LinkedIn’s algorithm work for you – targeting the right professionals and optimizing delivery – without letting costs spiral out of control.
Overall? Our recommendation is to spend plenty of time dialing in your organic content foundations. The formats, media types, hooks, and - above all - the core message, the strategic narrative, that you want to take to the market. Once you have that completely nailed?
Awesome. Go nuts with boosting your posts with ads, running different types of ads, and in general focusing less on more content and more on how to scale.
Just don't put the cart before the horse.
If you operate in a highly niche space where you are going to be discovered by people searching for someone who offers what you offer, rather than being found in the feed?
In that case: optimizing your LinkedIn presence isn’t just about posting content – it’s also about making your profile and company page easily discoverable through LinkedIn’s search algorithm. When users search for people (or services) on LinkedIn, you want to rank near the top for queries relevant to your business. Here’s how LinkedIn ranks profiles in search and how you can enhance your visibility:
Growing your LinkedIn network organically is crucial for extending your content’s reach and building potential customer relationships. The larger and more relevant your network, the more people will see your posts (and the more opportunities will come your way).
But you shouldn't just spam connection requests, just because. In fact, doing that over time can cause algorithm confusion, where LinkedIn doesn't know what kind of creator or professional you are, and so it doesn't show your posts to the right people.
Here are best practices for audience growth:
When connecting with someone when you don't necessarily have a specific reason, don't add a note! Explaining who you are and why you’d like to connect is fine, if you have a reason they would recognize. Say, you met them at a conference or just spoke with them on a call. Fine.
If you're going to break this rule, always tailor it to them – e.g., mention a recent post of theirs you liked but you must be genuine. Your acceptance rate will be AWFUL if you try to use AI to craft your connect requests, if you disingenuously refer to their recent content but you haven't actually read it, or any such cheap tricks.
Over time, aim to connect with industry peers, potential clients, partners, and thought leaders in your space. Don’t add too many people outside of your industry; be strategic. Our advice? When you're first starting out, it's okay to focus on getting more connections that are even somewhat relevant. But above a few thousand connections and it's much better to try to
Networking isn’t just about adding connections; it’s about building relationships. Use Aware to craft a feed of specific people, industries, groups, or lists of profiles that are meaningful to you:
👉🏼 Don't have an account yet? Start a free trial today. Click the link on the top right to get going.
Drop meaningful comments, add to the conversation, build on what they said, congratulate people on their achievements, and message folks when appropriate (e.g., when something going on with them is relevant to a business purpose of yours; let's say they are hiring for a role that you know a candidate for, or they're talking about an initiative you have a lot of experience and can advise them on).
When you engage with others, you stay on their radar and often on the radar of their network (for example, your comment on a 2nd-degree connection’s post is visible to their network, with your headline; if it’s insightful, people might click through to your profile, leading to new connections). As highlighted earlier, commenting thoughtfully can “organically boost your profile” views and exposure. This is a genuine way to attract inbound connection requests too – people are more inclined to connect with someone who added value to their post discussion.
Remember how we talked about comments providing you anywhere from 2, 3, even 4X the Profile Reach of your posts? Yeah. That.
Groups on LinkedIn are often centered around industries or interests (e.g., “Digital Marketing Professionals” or “HR Innovators Network”). But the trouble is, for whatever reason, they just have not really taken off. So they tend to be cesspools of spam, where no actual decision makers participate.
I do not, currently, know any successful professional LinkedIn users that consider groups to be anything more than a minor part of their strategy at best, and a distraction at worst.
So, take heed.
Now, if you are one of the extreme minority for whom a Group is working really well for? Please contact us. We'd love to interview you for this article!
Real relationships take time, and they are largely built in private. You can and should begin them in public, and you can nurture them in public, but the 1-on-1 chats, whether these are zoom calls or coffee meetings or even exchanging voice notes in the DMs, are where the magic happens.
Avoid spammy behaviors like mass messaging new contacts with sales pitches (that can lead to people removing you or even reporting). You'll get blocked.
Instead, nurture your network by consistently offering help, insight, and engagement. Over time, you’ll find your follower count and connections growing through a mix of outbound effort and inbound interest. In LinkedIn’s eyes, this kind of organic growth, rooted in genuine professional interaction, is exactly what the platform is meant for – and the algorithm will keep rewarding your content as your network expands, creating a snowball effect.
One very annoying trend we are seeing about to start, in early 2025? Automated voice notes. It sucks, but the day has come. Be aware. This will be advertised to you. Don't use it.
While the core principles of the LinkedIn algorithm apply universally, there are nuances in how you might approach LinkedIn based on your industry or sector. Different industries have different norms and levels of activity on LinkedIn. Here are some trends and tips to consider:
In summary, know your niche. If it's what you live and breathe, this should be no problem! While the LinkedIn algorithm’s fundamentals remain constant, aligning your content strategy with your industry’s culture will help you ride the algorithm’s wave more effectively. Whether it’s the polished slideshows for consulting, code snippets for developers, or inspirational team photos for hospitality, choose content that fits your field’s vibe.
The algorithm will reward engagement from the community you cultivate – and that community will grow if you’re speaking to them in a way that resonates. Always stay updated on your industry news and LinkedIn features; early adopters of new content types (like LinkedIn Live or newsletters) in an industry often get an outsized share of attention, since the algorithm gives a slight edge to those trying new formats. Adapt and experiment, and you’ll find the LinkedIn algorithm in 2025 to be a powerful ally in building your brand and business network.
Reach and engagement are not everything. In fact, they’re simply leading indicators of potential success: requirements to generate revenue from LinkedIn, but not predictors by themselves. You can’t grow revenue much at all, without any attention. This is basic marketing, and you can’t skip this step.
Yet while this may be oversimplifying, our analysis and experience show that there are broadly two aspects of someone’s public LinkedIn presence: the substance of their content (are they credible? have an accomplished background? speak intelligently about their field? engaging thoughtfully with their community?), and the production quality of it (well designed? mixed media formats? consistent brand?).
We have found that this quadrant largely explains a creator’s business results:
Let’s break that down.
In short: to grow a business via LinkedIn presence as the distribution channel, you do need attention. You get that, of course, by posting and engaging.
If you do a lot of consistent posting and engaging, AND the substance of what you are posting and engaging is high – meaning professionals in your industry or whoever you sell to think your contributions are relevant, meaningful, insightful – then you have a MUCH better chance at making a lot of money on LinkedIn.
So, substance is necessary for growing a real business. It’s not optional.
But you’ll have an even better chance of success if you combine a consistent, substantial LinkedIn presence with high production value. Thoughtful content AND excellent branding, copywriting, and media? That’s a mean combo.
What about if you post memes, pop culture and “pop workplace content”, and generally vapid stuff?
Well, then you’re unlikely to make much money from LinkedIn. You have a tiny but achievable shot at becoming a “huge personal brand” in terms of pure fame, and then you can sell sponsored posts, sponsored comments, and that kind of thing. But that’s not an asset you can really sell or exit for anything. And in general, you have a much lower ceiling.
The only way to get famous and make even medium revenue through vapid and unsubstantial content is through high production quality. Taking great pains to only post what is known to be popular, such as repurposing or even plagiarizing existing pop content from across the internet – and then ensuring your content is of a minimal reading level – is a clear path to LinkedIn fame, though not much revenue or business growth.
We don’t condone plagiarism, and we think copying others outright is both unethical and makes you look silly. But in terms of generating a medium amount of revenue with great effort, it does indeed “work”.
But the much clearer path to significant revenue, while mentally harder, is to draw on your authentic expertise and credibility to produce insightful and thoughtful posts and comments, and to come up with workflows to do that at some level of scale.
If you can introduce great branding and design to your presence? Even better.
In short, here are the paths to business growth on LinkedIn, in order of likelihood of success:
Personally, I have long chosen path #2 above, and am slowly wrapping my head around moving to path #1 by investing in media and branding. Yet there are creators generating way more than I am, with minimal production quality.
There’s no one right answer.
There’s only one wrong answer: low substance, low quality. Obviously – if you’re not trying and not producing value, you’ll never succeed.
This brings us to a more practical discussion. How do you actually get all of this done? What are some steps you can take to create substantial content and comments, and to increase the production quality of your content? We’ll outline some beginner, intermediate, and advanced workflows at a high level.
A simple beginner workflow involves focusing primarily on the substance of your content, while maximizing commenting over huge posting frequency.
Develop Messaging – Publish and Engage – Take Interactions Offline
Be social, as if you were at a tradeshow. But digitally. If someone posts or comments something you find interesting or relevant, respond to them publicly. If it makes sense, consider sending them a direct message as a sidebar. You can suggest meetings or other offline interactions too – again, where it makes sense to do so. This should be seen not very differently from normal business networking behavior. You wouldn’t spam the same pitch to 100 people you meet at a conference, so don’t do that on LinkedIn either. Be a personable, thoughtful professional who is clearly developing their business but also listening actively and participating intentionally in their field.
To do this, consider using Aware (useaware.co) to analyze your performance consistently and learn where you can improve:
No surprise, but this is similar to the beginner workflow, just – more and better! As you wrap your head around the whole LinkedIn thing, get traction on your content and your message, build followers, and start to close deals and generate revenue, you’ll be motivated to take things to the next level.
Start to improve your design. Get a branding specialist to create a consistent color scheme, look and feel, and even a design kit for your content. Also at this stage, you might hire a consultant or agency to come up with topics, ghostwrite content for you, and/or improve your hooks.
Building on the Intermediate workflow, Advanced LinkedIn presence starts to involve more operational work in a few different areas, with the goal of chasing multiple millions of revenue per year from LinkedIn:
If that sounds intimidating: don’t worry. Go step by step. Start small. It’ll be okay :)
Before recapping everything we’ve talked about so far in the State of LinkedIn, the Top Creator Difference, the Paths to Growth, and the Creator Workflows, let’s address a disease that afflicts many people who embark on this path:
The deadly illness of extreme LinkedIn burnout.
The worst thing you can do to yourself in this process is to jump the ladder too quickly. You say to yourself, “I’m going to go straight to the top of the Intermediate level”. You resolve to produce high quality content every day. You’re armed with Justin Welsh’s fancy course, you have a content matrix, you’re going to write copy and create the heck out of carousels and videos and infographics and…
Suddenly, before you’ve given yourself any time to breathe and actually invest time in the people you’re supposed to get to know and work with, from LinkedIn… you’ve gone and given all of your energy to going through the motions.
Remember: the purpose of LinkedIn is ultimately to reach, meet, and build high-quality relationships with the right people. People you want to partner with, work with, or serve as your clients. People take time to build trust with you, so this won’t happen overnight. It will probably take a few months of consistently posting weekly and engaging with at least some consistency, to start seeing tangible results: inbound leads, quality connections, valuable conversations you wouldn’t otherwise have had.
If you dump the tanks of trying to learn, brand, message, write, publish, and engage right out of the gate, your chances of burning out and giving up too soon, before the process has had room to work – are very high.
Maybe you’re the type of person who, once you learn a system, can wholeheartedly commit to it in the face of any obstacle, for several months, investing time and money into it without seeing an immediate return. If that’s you – power to you. You may disregard this advice. But if you’re like most people? Give yourself time. Start slow. Ramp up. Get help. Allow yourself to take notice of the initial traction you’re getting, before you triple and quadruple down into it.
The growth of a personal brand on LinkedIn that fuels the growth of your company and digital assets – and ultimately, your wealth and richness of your career – is not something you should try to take lightly and to achieve in a very short period. Slow and steady as they say. (Medium and steady is fine, too. But don’t push it!)
LinkedIn is diverting more attention away from Organic and into ads, which is natural and not surprising. Their advertising revenue growth data, and our own proprietary research at Aware, confirm this to be true. That means the algorithm is changing. But crucially, the way to grow a business has remained fundamentally the same. While both intermediate and top creators, and Aware users, have a much better chance of having grown their presence over the last two years, the bar has indeed been raised for attention and engagement that used to flow more freely.
At the same time, while reach and engagement are good and necessary things to build LinkedIn into a valuable distribution channel for your business, remember that the point of this is to build a real business. Not just to get attention for the sake of it. That means you should be focused on reaching the right people with a substantive message, and engaging with your community and ecosystem, first and foremost. Only then does it make sense to start investing more time and money into production quality, gloss, video, and agency and consulting help.
And remember that preventing burnout and not moving too quickly through these steps is an essential part of making this whole process sustainable, especially when results typically don’t come immediately. We want to thank you immensely for reading this article, engaging with it and with us, and for being a great human. We hope this helps, and we wish you good health and a prosperous future. And we hope to be able to play a part in your growth and prosperity.
Very best,
- The Team at Aware
Sources: The insights and recommendations above are based on LinkedIn’s documented best practices and analysis from 2024-2025 social media reports. Key references include LinkedIn’s own algorithm explanations, Hootsuite’s 2025 LinkedIn algorithm guide, expert commentary on engagement signals, Aware's data on posting times and engagements, Neil Patel’s 2025 LinkedIn Ads cost breakdown, and LinkedIn SEO advice from marketing experts. These sources and LinkedIn’s own platform updates have informed the best practices in this report, ensuring the strategies are up-to-date and effective for the current algorithm.